I've received what I assume must be a first batch of e-mails with stakeholder consultation documents on the new telecoms package. Please see my previous post for more details. First of all, find the reply of the European Commission here. And these are the consultation documents the Commission has so far wished to reveal:

UPDATE (2014-05-22) : better mapping of the disclosed document stakeholder identities.

ARD (organization for German Broadcasters, member of the EBU.); BT  (former British state monopolist); B-Sky-B (British Sky Broadcasting Group, a cable provider); Bouygues (french mobile operator and network owner); CCIA (computer and communications industry association, mostly american IT firms); BEUC document is appended to the Bouygues document(!); CDT (american industry-funded NGO, moderate); COLT (British telecoms operator for business services); Coop Voce (Italian MVNO, note also EAFM); EAFM (finance industry something European association for virtual mobile network operators - mobile operators without their own base station infrastructure); European Broadcasting Union (public service television stations in Europe); European Competitive Telecoms Association; European data protection supervisor; European Newspapers and Publishers Association; ETNO (incumbent operators, former state monopolies); Forbrukerombudet (danish consumer group??); GSMA (mobile network infrastructure owners and builders); KPN (former dutch monopolist); Liberty Global (world's largest cable provider, owner of UPC et c); Postmobile/Postemobile (simultaneously documents from Belgian MVNO Postmobile and Italian MVNO Postemobile - which are different companies and as is seen by scrolling the pdf); ReWheel (Finnish telecoms competition analysis firm); Verizon (one out of the two American network owners); Vodafone (world's largest mobile network owner).

Organisations I can't immediately identity: ARD, Coop Voce, COLT and Postmobile. UPDATE (2014-05-22): The Commission seems to have received inputs from both Postmobile and Postemobile, which in fact appear to be two separate entities. However, both are on first-name basis with Roberto Viola who's the general-director of DG CNCT, so reasonably he is aware that they are in fact separate stakeholders for the purpose of this disclosure, not the same.

Note that BEREC - the European Body of Regulators for Electronic Communications, seems not to have been asked for inputs! This means the European Commission has essentially cut the member states out of the preparatory process for this legislation.

Also notable is that BEUC - the European Consumer organisation - seems not to have been given the chance to provide inputs even though the European Commission explicitly refer to them in their Impact Assessment (Annex I, page 103 of the document and onwards). (UPDATE (2014-05-22) : see latter half of the Bouygues document for BEUC inputs). Neither does the Commission appear to have received stakeholder inputs from Deutsche Telekom, Telefonica or TeliaSonera despite these three actors being explicitly mentioned by the impact assessment. The European Commission has not asked European Digital Rights initiative, despite this being the most active group for digital rights in Brussels for the past three years.

This will require a follow-up, definitely.

UPDATE (2014-05-22) : Please also see DG CNCT General-Director Robert Madelin's blogpost on the above document request. Robert Madelin is looking "to respond to Amelia Andersdotter's blog post on the Hunt for the Connected Continent, which I think takes too narrow a view of the interactions that have taken place around this package." My original request was for "all the relevant stakeholder inputs", which unfortunately was too exhaustive a request for the EC to understand what I meant. In my clarifying request I seem to have made the semantic mistake of referring to "documents" which the EC has interpreted to mean "documents which are presently in existence and archived as stakeholder inputs in the specified context", rather than for instance "a document listing all the meetings that the Commissioner and her staff have engaged in around this meeting with various stakeholder groups or thinktanks which is not presently compiled but which could be compiled in order to ensure the utmost transparency of the legislative procedure of the European Union)."