There is no need for DRM to begin with, so why do they want it? Broadcasters have survived without the ability to control what viewers have done with the recieved signal, for decades!
To be able to see what is beeing sent encrypted from the server, your equipment has to both recieve and decrypt it. The DRM-part is there to stop you from saving it. This is basically just the old Betamax-case all over again, they want a law that effectively makes it illegal to not throw away information that was given to you. The only time i have encountered this before, has been about military orders where it has been mandatory to destroy the information after it has been read by the reciever. So, they want a law that force people to treat publicized entertainment as military secrets. This is sick.
There is no need for DRM to begin with, so why do they want it? Broadcasters have survived without the ability to control what viewers have done with the recieved signal, for decades!
To be able to see what is beeing sent encrypted from the server, your equipment has to both recieve and decrypt it. The DRM-part is there to stop you from saving it. This is basically just the old Betamax-case all over again, they want a law that effectively makes it illegal to not throw away information that was given to you. The only time i have encountered this before, has been about military orders where it has been mandatory to destroy the information after it has been read by the reciever. So, they want a law that force people to treat publicized entertainment as military secrets. This is sick.