They could do useful sociological work on the security sector. My impression is that we could use a good public research institution to keep track of what private agents on the security scene are doing, and maybe compiling or collecting information about the European scene in this regard. Unfortunately, ENISA instead interpret their mission as collecting "best practises" from either large private companies/lobby groups or other security agencies.
I see this with many European institutions with the unfortunate result that we don't know that much about how European jurisdictions compare to each other in some otherwise very border transgressing fields.
They could do useful sociological work on the security sector. My impression is that we could use a good public research institution to keep track of what private agents on the security scene are doing, and maybe compiling or collecting information about the European scene in this regard. Unfortunately, ENISA instead interpret their mission as collecting "best practises" from either large private companies/lobby groups or other security agencies.
I see this with many European institutions with the unfortunate result that we don't know that much about how European jurisdictions compare to each other in some otherwise very border transgressing fields.