It's jus weird the questions that are being asked. It seems like member states governments are mostly concerned with whether there are any contradictions between the current legal texts of the member states and the text in the ACTA agreement, rather than whether the ACTA text has any substantial impact on the way the present legislation would be interpreted, or whether the explicit encouragement in ACTA for industries to strikes voluntary agreements to harm user's freedoms or future entrepreneurs could be expected to impact their future domestic, digital markets.
I'm a bit distressed that member states focus on such a narrow set of objections from all the multitudes of objections that have been raised against the agreement.
It's jus weird the questions that are being asked. It seems like member states governments are mostly concerned with whether there are any contradictions between the current legal texts of the member states and the text in the ACTA agreement, rather than whether the ACTA text has any substantial impact on the way the present legislation would be interpreted, or whether the explicit encouragement in ACTA for industries to strikes voluntary agreements to harm user's freedoms or future entrepreneurs could be expected to impact their future domestic, digital markets.
I'm a bit distressed that member states focus on such a narrow set of objections from all the multitudes of objections that have been raised against the agreement.