We have a lot of meetings, sessions and hearings here inside of the European Parliament. Yesterday, European People's Party organized an event dedicated to the current state of a common market of telecommunications services - called Telecom single market.
The hearing had a form of four consecutive panels about these topics: Roaming, Net neutrality, Rights of the end users and (radiofrequency) Spectrum. Despite the fact, that roaming costs are right now seen as one of the major issues in European digital single market debate, I would like to focus here on the Net neutrality session.
All of the three speakers discussing this issue (Thomas Grob, Kirsten Fiedler and Frode Sørensen) supported the idea of net neutrality, as the idea itself is pretty much not a matter of concern. But how net neutrality or non-neutrality is seen and defined, that can be disputable. At least during this debate it was so.
I would like to mention here some of the interesting points of each one of these three speakers.
One of the interesting points of Mr. Grob was the comparison made between Specialized Services and Internet stores. Both online stores and Specialized services are regulated by a simple company. If you have your application rejected from the Internet store that is owned by a private company, it should be only logical that only companies that can afford this can have their apps available as "Specialized services". Well... no. Do we really want to have infrastructure that is supposed to serve all of us to become a simple public business? Or what if it will turn to something else... How will our freedom of speech look like when a simple internet user won't be able to reach everyone, as he currently can?